unmesh0110@gmail.com, shivendrakr.maurya@gmail.com | 8004802456, 09415627372

Peer Review Process

Peer Review

Unmesh is committed to publish high quality works with significant policy implications and contribution to the literature. Decision about each manuscript is taken following a rigorous process:

The peer review process:

A designated member of the editorial board will make an initial assessment about the quality and suitability of a submission in terms of scope , originality and contribution to existing body of knowledge. Moreover, papers written within the guidelines regarding the structure of the paper is also given consideration in initial assessment. Once the designated internal editorial board member is satisfied about the suitability of a submission, it is sent to two anonymous peer reviewers for their comment.

The reviewer will assign marks and make comment about following six categories:

  • Originality of the paper.
  • The value of the research question and research gap.
  • The soundness of the conceptual and technical or methodological framework.
  • Insightful discussion in result and discussion section.
  • The contribution of the paper.
  • Academic writing quality.

Publication Frequency

Frequency of Publication: Half yearly

Open Access Policy

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution . Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.